Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A520M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 00:40
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 63.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 266
83% 156 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 831
82% 668 Pts
64-Core 1,016
63% 1,016 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 87E1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 13
Parallax 23.9
12% 17.3 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 19.9
14% 15.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M371 500GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMF0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1223 1048 22 306 20 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 637
Write 1162
Mixed 830
SusWrite 440
174% 767 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 44.6
146% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 518
396% 524 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 121%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D12.2356CS.001 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 27 60 23.6" 1280 720 HKC2451 24N5C
Typical PRIME A520M-K Builds (Compare 1,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback