Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507XI
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230911
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 19:29
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 73.6
1-Core 197
2-Core 379
112% 216 Pts
4-Core 749
8-Core 1,346
126% 1,048 Pts
64-Core 1,756
109% 1,756 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 23BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 176
Parallax 194
170% 193 fps
MRender 263
Gravity 166
Splatting 116
141% 181 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 148%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,568
Write 1578
Mixed 1,281
329% 1,476 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 30.3
138% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 993
DQ Write 837
DQ Mixed 898
678% 910 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66MEBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 48.5
MC Mixed 43.8
138% 48.3 GB/s
SC Read 50.3
SC Write 66.1
SC Mixed 49.6
158% 55.3 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 65" 1280 720 PHL0A82 Philips FTV
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback