Xiaomi XM22AL5S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemXiaomi XM22AL5S  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel NUC12WSBi5
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221107
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 13 '23 at 08:27
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 55.8
1-Core 158
2-Core 282
86% 165 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 726
75% 603 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Intel(8086 3024) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3222
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 12.1
9% 13.3 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 14
14% 17.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN3 1TNVMe-M.2/80 1TB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A7T36A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 664 378 308 492 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,534
Write 1,172
Mixed 1,007
SusWrite 455
232% 1,042 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 52.3
175% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 360
248% 312 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 157%
Great: 377%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Cuso CS4S3200D22161C 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.9% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 21.9
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 28 60 27.2" 2560 1369 GSM5BCB LG ULTRAFINE
Typical XM22AL5S Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Xiaomi XM22AL5S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback