Today's hottest deals

Jp.ik T304

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive13.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJp.ik T304  (all builds)
MotherboardJP.ik T304
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 00:16
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Memory 8.55
1-Core 9.1
2-Core 11.9
6% 9.85 Pts
4-Core 15.3
8-Core 17.8
2% 16.5 Pts
64-Core 17.8
1% 17.8 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Elitegroup(1019 9840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07656
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 30 28 36 30 34 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.2% Very poor
Read 62.6
Write 251
Mixed 128
SusWrite 31.9
27% 118 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 6.6
22% 7.93 MB/s
DQ Read 52
DQ Write 30.7
DQ Mixed 39.9
30% 40.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS004G-H2666GSC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
5.16% Terrible
MC Read 1.8
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.8 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.4
3% 0.97 GB/s
Latency 461
9% 461 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 16 13 60 11.6" 1280 720 BOE0A5D
Typical T304 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Jp.ik T304

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback