LG 16U70R-G.AA56B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLG 16U70R-G.AA56B  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 16U70R
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 18:59
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 38.3
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 121
41% 74 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 384
34% 290 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1854 0519) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
9.96% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 30.1
7% 19.1 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 18.9
16% 20 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.96%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00B07 512GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 644 612 598 656 652 655 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 834
Write 668
Mixed 702
SusWrite 636
160% 710 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 31.2
102% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 303
207% 261 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 115%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 28
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 23.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 15 60 16" 1280 720 LGD0773
Typical 16U70R-G.AA56B Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: LG 16U70R-G.AA56B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback