Today's hottest deals

Adata XENIA 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAdata XENIA 14  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 16:30
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 131
59% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 354
35% 288 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1D05 1105) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 21.1
12% 19.2 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 23
Splatting 11.5
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 512GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82A7T9PA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 192 140 117 108 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,699
Write 739
Mixed 1,089
SusWrite 195
205% 931 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 50.3
165% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 465
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 385
266% 338 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 145%
Great: 388%
Adata LEGEND 840 512GB
119GB free
Firmware: 1.2.3.P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 670 508 701 550 511 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 563
Write 723
Mixed 548
SusWrite 580
137% 604 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 39.5
144% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 162
129% 177 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 111%
Great: 407%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon Power Computer & Communications Adata 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 27.7
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 14.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27C3 MX279
Typical XENIA 14 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Adata XENIA 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback