Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-D  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 09:36
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 194
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 301
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 512GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14941
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 243 286 327 321 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 279
Write 317
Mixed 287
SusWrite 281
66% 291 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 13
67% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 240
166% 202 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 Corsair CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 32 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM07D0 SAMSUNG
Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 2,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback