Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Memory 7.75 1-Core 56.3 2-Core 91.9 26% 52 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 160 23% 169 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 3FB5) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	2.81% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 7.5 4% 6.2 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.81% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G-1101 512GB 9,323 User benchmarks, average bench 165% 305GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21110001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 253 260 218 258 285 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Read 946 Write 324 Mixed 347 SusWrite 252 102% 467 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 26.9 90% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 468 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 338 263% 366 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB 2,729 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 8 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 4.1 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 946 4% 946 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	7%	15	49	19	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO61ED

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	2,210x
Iris Plus G4IntelBench 6%, 12,263 samples	141x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	134x

SSD
SKHynix_HFM256GDHTNI-87A0B 256GBBench 143%, 4,825 samples	277x
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	233x
PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1101 256GBWDCBench 129%, 5,242 samples	197x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBSamsungBench 65%, 2,729 samples	455x
HMA851S6DJR6N-XN Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBHynixBench 67%, 1,560 samples	248x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	177x