Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8876
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 22:15
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 264
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 936
85% 712 Pts
64-Core 1466
91% 1466 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$280
HP(103C 88D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 130
Parallax 127
121% 135 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 88.1
88% 110 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 108%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TB
825GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1439 766 793 792 789 814 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,265
Write 1,517
Mixed 1,186
SusWrite 899
274% 1,217 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 54.6
190% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,123
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 1020
737% 960 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 206%
Great: 268%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0002YXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 139 138 139 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 131
Write 130
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 138
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 77%
Great: 77%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
465GB free
Firmware: AV002D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 115 115 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 111
Write 113
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 115
71% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP37D4U1S8MR-8X 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 35
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 29.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 23.8" 1280 720 VSC623B VX2418-P FHD
Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $256
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback