Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 06:33
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$440
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 77.9
1-Core 232
2-Core 442
129% 250 Pts
4-Core 917
8-Core 1,709
157% 1313 Pts
64-Core 4,295
266% 4,295 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 125%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Asus(1043 882E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 535.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 180
Parallax 154
130% 165 fps
MRender 77.6
Gravity 112
Splatting 125
88% 105 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 113%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 810 720 642 705 690 640 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,033
Write 2,304
Mixed 1,759
SusWrite 701
382% 1,699 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 270
4K Mixed 89.3
341% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,820
DQ Write 1607
DQ Mixed 1,548
1,206% 1,658 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 304%
Great: 304%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
2TB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3250 3247 3254 3259 3256 3254 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
522% Outstanding
Read 2781
Write 3,141
Mixed 2,921
SusWrite 3,253
684% 3,024 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 239
4K Mixed 115
378% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 2,349
DQ Write 1,891
DQ Mixed 2,107
1,581% 2,116 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 522%
Great: 508%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2480 2227 1546 1555 1547 1573 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
414% Outstanding
Read 2,395
Write 2,396
Mixed 1,920
SusWrite 1,822
480% 2,133 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 108
365% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 2,335
DQ Write 1,877
DQ Mixed 2,036
1,543% 2,082 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 414%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6400 C36 2x16GB-$105
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 56
MC Write 53.5
MC Mixed 52.1
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 28
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 140%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 26 60 31.5" 2560 1369 GSM772A 32GK650F
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 297%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 390%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $1,466
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback