Today's hottest deals

Thunderobot ZERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemThunderobot ZERO  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT NLZE
Memory17.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230118
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 06:02
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 69.9
1-Core 191
2-Core 408
113% 223 Pts
4-Core 812
8-Core 1,409
134% 1,110 Pts
64-Core 2966
184% 2966 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 111%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1500) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3688
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.45% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 11.6
8% 12.2 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 13.2
Splatting 11.3
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.45%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2212 994 1003 991 1011 1008 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,104
Write 2,326
Mixed 2,092
SusWrite 1,203
435% 1,931 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 63.8
205% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,370
DQ Write 983
DQ Mixed 1160
871% 1,171 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 274%
Great: 421%
Ssstc CL5-8D512 512GB
211GB free
Firmware: EX92102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 132 133 133 133 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 966
Write 940
Mixed 935
SusWrite 167
168% 752 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 41.7
199% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 915
DQ Mixed 639
525% 739 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 143%
Great: 208%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 32GB
4800, 5600 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 51.9
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 49.3
137% 48 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 21.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 123%
This bench: 123%
Great: 152%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 16" 1280 720 BOE0B12
Typical ZERO Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Thunderobot ZERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback