Lenovo 20W5S7QB03

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20W5S7QB03  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20W5S7QB03
Memory42.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 13:08
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 61
1-Core 139
2-Core 222
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 574
54% 451 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 22C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 23.2
16% 21.9 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 15.8
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7003V5LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 664 859 799 814 1178 1132 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,123
Write 1,387
Mixed 1,068
SusWrite 908
253% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 52.2
192% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 571
407% 533 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 182%
Great: 274%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44BM0-CWE Kingston 9905744-111.A00G 47GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 14.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN40BA
Typical 20W5S7QB03 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20W5S7QB03

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback