Today's hottest deals

Asus H61M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H61M-D  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 23:50
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 191
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 483
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(174B 353E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1925 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 58.4
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 74
48% 62.8 fps
MRender 59.1
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 38.6
43% 54.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 112 112 104 110 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 204
Write 130
Mixed 170
SusWrite 109
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 30.2
100% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 115
92% 126 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52%
Great: 73%
Toshiba MK6476GSX 640GB-$299
266GB free
Firmware: GS001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 65 66 67 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 57.2
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 65
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 48%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$17
125GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 32 38 41 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 57.3
Write 36.1
Mixed 34
SusWrite 37.8
30% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-668.A00LF 99U5402-435.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACI22C3 ASUS VP228
Typical H61M-D Builds (Compare 286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback