Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210710
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '23 at 12:33
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$120 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 86 1-Core 118 2-Core 235 82% 146 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 559 66% 512 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
ATI Radeon HD 5400 10,400 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 6000) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 1%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.01% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 9.3 Parallax 7.6 5% 7.77 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 10.8 8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.01% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,756 Write 1,796 Mixed 1,329 363% 1,627 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 56.7 181% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 995 DQ Write 946 DQ Mixed 1,095 788% 1,012 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 224GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 113 113 112 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 104 Write 104 Mixed 66.4 SusWrite 112 71% 96.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FE 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.2% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 24.1 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 23.4 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	58	75	23.8"	1280 720	PHLC155 PHL 243V7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	449x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	252x
Core i5-8400Intel $120Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	227x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	147x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	136x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	106x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	69x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	49x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	43x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	85x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $476

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16