HP Z4 G5 Workstation Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z4 G5 Workstation Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8962
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 15:16
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon w3-2425
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 65.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 262
78% 148 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 863
82% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,108
69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 12GB
HP(103C 1611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Lighting 88.9
Reflection 99.3
Parallax 89.2
72% 92.5 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 78.1
Splatting 79.4
71% 88.1 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH1 512GB
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NGXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1913 1951 1945 1751 654 651 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,715
Write 1,625
Mixed 1,617
SusWrite 1,478
362% 1,609 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 46.6
152% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 742
DQ Write 906
DQ Mixed 852
635% 833 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 243%
Great: 400%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M321R2GA3BB6-CQKET 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
161% Outstanding
MC Read 73
MC Write 60.6
MC Mixed 64.6
189% 66.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 161%
This bench: 161%
Great: 225%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 47 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D20 S24F350
Typical Z4 G5 Workstation Desktop PC Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

System: HP Z4 G5 Workstation Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback