Today's hottest deals

Advan 1701

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAdvan 1701  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230724
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 10:11
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 47.2
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 64.7
32% 49.8 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 138
15% 119 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Device(1E50 8038) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
6.8% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 11.4
8% 9.6 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 11
Splatting 0.3
5% 6.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.8%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Airdisk 256GB SSD 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0808A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 189 137 118 133 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 740
Write 589
Mixed 241
SusWrite 155
95% 431 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 6.6
30% 8.97 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 71.2
54% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 0A94 D4R8GS26A8R 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.4% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0A6A
Typical 1701 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Advan 1701

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback