Intel NUC7JYB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel NUC7CJYH
MotherboardIntel NUC7JYB  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180125
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.81% Terrible
Memory 6.66
1-Core 26.6
2-Core 42.2
13% 25.2 Pts
4-Core 37.2
8-Core 83.1
7% 60.2 Pts
64-Core 18.5
1% 18.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 6.81%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 77 78 76 115 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.3% Poor
Read 165
Write 60.3
Mixed 95.1
SusWrite 82.8
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 5.4
21% 8.37 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 58.1
DQ Mixed 73.8
60% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FAD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
MC Read 0.7
MC Write 1
MC Mixed 1.1
3% 0.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.67 GB/s
Latency 485
8% 485 ns
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 34 15 32 0" 1280 720
Typical NUC7JYB Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7JYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback