Mm-vision TUF-GAMING-B760M-PLUS-10DE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics249% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMm-vision TUF-GAMING-B760M-PLUS-10DE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS
Memory15.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 18:10
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700KF-$374
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 228
2-Core 452
131% 255 Pts
4-Core 911
8-Core 1,737
158% 1,324 Pts
64-Core 3587
222% 3587 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
Asus(1043 8902) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
249% Outstanding
Lighting 364
Reflection 352
Parallax 377
296% 364 fps
MRender 497
Gravity 309
Splatting 222
266% 342 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 249%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRDK2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2831
Write 4,205
Mixed 3,102
760% 3,379 MB/s
4K Read 69.7
4K Write 277
4K Mixed 116
401% 154 MB/s
DQ Read 2038
DQ Write 1,678
DQ Mixed 1,883
1,404% 1,867 MB/s
Poor: 266% Great: 649%
Seagate One Touch HDD 1TB
701GB free
Firmware: 1708
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 64.1
Write 136
Mixed 94.2
74% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 38.4
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 30
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM5BD3 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF-GAMING-B760M-PLUS-10DE Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 233%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO

System: Mm-vision TUF-GAMING-B760M-PLUS-10DE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback