Panasonic FZG1-3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPanasonic FZG1-3  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic FZG1-3
Memory4.5 GB free of 8.01562 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 23:38
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 133
54% 91 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 181
23% 176 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 3
Parallax 5.9
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 6
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G3AMNB-2200A 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10108L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 277 282 284 299 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 458
Write 313
Mixed 267
SusWrite 287
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 24.1
88% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 211
175% 253 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FZG1-3 5CTSA62262 0032 FZG1-3 5CTSA62262 56GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 10.1" 1296 759 MEI96A2 G1_FHD
Typical FZG1-3 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic FZG1-3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback