Micro F7BSC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro F7BSC  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BSC
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 09:19
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 185
2-Core 368
108% 209 Pts
4-Core 737
8-Core 1,319
124% 1,028 Pts
64-Core 1693
105% 1693 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.40.03.38
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 92.1
48% 58.7 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 91.3
56% 63.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 1TB
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,337
Write 2,475
Mixed 1732
418% 1,848 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 82.7
281% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,312
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 1,289
848% 1,025 MB/s
Poor: 224% Great: 415%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD56S46BD8HA-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
165% Outstanding
MC Read 55.2
MC Write 68.1
MC Mixed 55.3
170% 59.5 GB/s
SC Read 52.4
SC Write 67.3
SC Mixed 55.3
167% 58.3 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 165%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 30 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5B08 LG Ultra HD
Typical F7BSC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Micro F7BSC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback