Alienware m17 R5 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m17 R5 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0R5XW9
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231017
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 20:13
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 234
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 676
67% 549 Pts
64-Core 923
57% 923 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Dell(1028 0B5B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.10.24
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.7% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 40.2
21% 36 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 27.9
Splatting 23.1
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv1t02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB
690GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11304102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 994 823 864 1009 1205 1283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,338
Write 1,272
Mixed 1,164
SusWrite 1,029
270% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 41.5
138% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 755
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 612
422% 536 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 181%
Great: 451%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG78AEBSA095N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
118% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 49.6
MC Mixed 40.5
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 27.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 118%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 165 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0AE2
Typical m17 R5 AMD Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Alienware m17 R5 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback