Bangho MAX L4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBangho MAX L4  (all builds)
MotherboardBangho MAX L4
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220308
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 01:51
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 214
68% 127 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 423
48% 377 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Clevo(1558 4050) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 18.5
10% 14 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 15.4
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS250G 250GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 709 549 432 439 540 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 905
Write 256
Mixed 573
SusWrite 521
125% 564 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 12.9
74% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 356
227% 263 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5711-012.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 9.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 10.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 14" 1280 720 SHP153A
Typical MAX L4 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Bangho MAX L4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback