Gigabyte GA-B550M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 04:26
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 76.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 276
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 865
82% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,061
66% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 86CB) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC2500M8500G 500GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S7780101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 846 749 717 718 402 728 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2659
Write 1,405
Mixed 1,219
SusWrite 693
330% 1,494 MB/s
4K Read 57.3
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 47.2
175% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 261
247% 406 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 223%
Great: 334%
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB
413GB free
Firmware: UK400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 217 229 209 207 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 445
Write 378
Mixed 312
SusWrite 237
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 14.6
68% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 91.1
DQ Mixed 34.5
45% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 59%
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 326 337 334 334 339 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 305
Write 204
Mixed 256
SusWrite 334
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 21.8
88% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 98.2
DQ Mixed 53
62% 110 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 81%
Jmicron Generic 256GB
226GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 335 306 325 329 331 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 361
Write 330
Mixed 326
SusWrite 328
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 16.3
76% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 80.7
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 30.3
38% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 78%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 159 158 157 158 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%
Patriot M.2 P300 256GB
202GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.6% Above average
Read 38.1
Write 38.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 38.9
53% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 15.1
964% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 19.4
DQ Mixed 17.7
1,325% 18 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E82-2666E NMUD480E82-2666E NMUD480E82-2666E GKE800UD102408-2666 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.2% Very good
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 32
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 31.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7000 C32R50x
Typical GA-B550M DS3H Builds (Compare 7,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback