Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST H81M-PRO S1
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211222
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 17:19
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770S-$96
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 62.7
39% 57.1 Pts
4-Core 63.1
8-Core 109
10% 85.9 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.1% Very good
Lighting 97.9
Reflection 98.3
Parallax 88.7
80% 95 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 92.2
Splatting 77.7
72% 89.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 512GB 512GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMLA.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 55 97 130 56 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 361
Write 174
Mixed 323
SusWrite 104
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 0.7
69% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 38.9
DQ Mixed 27.9
42% 82.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316C10F/8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 4.8
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 33 60 19" 1280 720 DEL4047 DEL 1908FPBLK
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback