Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 20:35
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 181
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 417
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
XFX(1682 3060) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 6
6% 7.27 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 7.5
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 160 166 163 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 330
Write 244
Mixed 240
SusWrite 161
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 32.7
117% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 128
106% 152 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
378GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 101 104 106 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65% Good
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 103
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65%
Great: 69%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB
32GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.7 13 15 2.9 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 106
Write 7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 9.1
25% 31 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
92% 8.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 28.8" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback