HP 240 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 240 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 8819
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 14:37
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 214
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 256
35% 261 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8819) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
8.92% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 12.2
9% 12.5 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 8.4
9% 11.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.92%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-256G-1006 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1564 1615 1523 520 351 343 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,710
Write 1,252
Mixed 1,202
SusWrite 986
288% 1,288 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 54.3
214% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 919
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 596
472% 668 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 225%
Great: 309%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-069.A00G Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68% Good
MC Read 20
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 20.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 15.7
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 3 60 14" 1280 720 BOE092C
Typical 240 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $243Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback