User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemAMD
MotherboardAMD A320
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230818
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 22:27
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 173
2-Core 342
108% 201 Pts
4-Core 673
8-Core 1,018
105% 846 Pts
64-Core 1,163
72% 1,163 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
PNY(196E 13E3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 134
Parallax 172
135% 157 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
115% 146 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 122%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDEV1TB-D8 1TB
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1226A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1572 1629 1627 1681 1661 1673 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,768
Write 1,664
Mixed 1,222
SusWrite 1,640
354% 1,574 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 32.4
215% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 1063
DQ Mixed 473
470% 738 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 272%
Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W644GU44J2320NH 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 0P 5R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 19% 78 218 60 120 31.5" 1280 720 ACR09A6 ED320Q X
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback