Today's hottest deals

Medion Crawler E50

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion Crawler E50  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NPxxRNx1
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 12:11
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 176
2-Core 340
103% 197 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 974
98% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,217
75% 1,217 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 A552) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4617
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 103
Parallax 118
124% 124 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 84.4
94% 120 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-512G-PHISON-SSD-BICS5 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 170 153 116 233 778 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 609
Write 140
Mixed 1,231
SusWrite 297
128% 569 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 77.7
265% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,423
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 701
536% 765 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 160%
Great: 361%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 37.9
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 24.2
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0910
Typical Crawler E50 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Medion Crawler E50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback