Supermicro C7Z270-CG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro C7Z270-CG  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7Z270-CG
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 13:26
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500T
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 346
45% 339 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.6% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 107
Parallax 107
92% 109 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 98.8
Splatting 92.2
86% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 660 322 349 367 373 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,849
Write 1599
Mixed 1,323
SusWrite 407
289% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 51.8
169% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 938
DQ Write 538
DQ Mixed 666
515% 714 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 184%
Great: 271%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8TT CB8GU2666.C8PT 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 25.5
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 11 60 34.8" 1280 720 ACR0478 Z35
Typical C7Z270-CG Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Supermicro C7Z270-CG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback