Today's hottest deals

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 17:40
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$152
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 171
2-Core 343
109% 202 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,195
113% 937 Pts
64-Core 1,504
93% 1,504 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Asus(1043 883A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 206
Parallax 198
182% 209 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 150
Splatting 132
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 421 306 299 239 407 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 346
Mixed 347
SusWrite 342
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 50.9
180% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 220
199% 305 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 111%
T-force 1TB 1TB
102GB free
Firmware: 02K0S6OA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 463 147 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 475
Mixed 425
SusWrite 252
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54.2
182% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 128
162% 288 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
59GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,541
Write 2,568
Mixed 2,391
559% 2,500 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 99.7
320% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,268
DQ Write 998
DQ Mixed 1,123
843% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 34.6
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 31.8
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 39.2
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 0P 5R 6G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 28% 46 218 60 144 24" 1280 720 AUS24AC VG248
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 6,186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback