Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 246%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics239% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Raider GE78HX 13VI
MotherboardMSI MS-17S1  (all builds)
Memory44.1 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 19:29
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 197
2-Core 390
113% 220 Pts
4-Core 740
8-Core 1,280
122% 1,010 Pts
64-Core 2,770
172% 2,770 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 106%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3300 MHz, MLim: 4600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Lighting 346
Reflection 374
Parallax 393
282% 371 fps
MRender 441
Gravity 312
Splatting 223
254% 325 fps
Poor: 144%
This bench: 239%
Great: 243%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3731 3573 3728 3888 3886 955 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 138
Write 523
Mixed 219
SusWrite 3,293
241% 1,044 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 3.8
47% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 291
228% 310 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 234%
Great: 530%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 246 246 251 252 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 349
Write 293
Mixed 263
SusWrite 249
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 16.9
55% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 75.9
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 74.3
56% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 78%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$530
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 826 417 419 417 127 715 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 129%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$276
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 488 495 497 491 482 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 453
Mixed 436
SusWrite 491
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 25.2
84% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 596
DQ Mixed 619
462% 611 MB/s
Poor: 303%
This bench: 102%
Great: 616%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-5600S4040A322x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
151% Outstanding
MC Read 57.9
MC Write 61.2
MC Mixed 58
169% 59 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 29.9
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 151%
Great: 183%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 44 240 17.2" 1280 720 AUO84A6
Typical MS-17S1 Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 236%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback