Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	8.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 7305 20 User benchmarks, average bench 22% U3E1, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Memory 25.4 1-Core 28 2-Core 44 20% 32.5 Pts	4-Core 99.1 8-Core 117 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,559 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Device(3100 0009) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	8.23% Terrible	Lighting 9.3 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 10.8 8% 10.3 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 12.8 Splatting 11.2 10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.23% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
C-E80T128G2-P3D3B3E13 128GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFD00.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 251 306 350 214 169 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 381 Write 267 Mixed 299 SusWrite 253 67% 300 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 9.9 35% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 35.2 DQ Mixed 79.4 61% 87 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 153%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB 2,450 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.9% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 11.9 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 256 16% 256 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	1	50	12	60	13.9"	1296 759	CMN14D4

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i5-1240PIntelBench 83%, 3,751 samples	5x
Core i7-1260PIntelBench 85%, 4,690 samples	2x
Gen Intel Core i7-1270P12thBench 74%, 712 samples	2x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	5x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples	4x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 10%, 2,559 samples	3x

SSD
C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13 512GBBench 168%, 75 samples	4x
C-E80T256G4-P3D3B3E13 256GBBench 134%, 98 samples	3x
MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 166%, 12,842 samples	2x

RAM
M471A2G43BB2-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 2,466 samples	3x
8ATF2G64HZ-3G2F1 1x16GBMicronBench 42%, 619 samples	3x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GBMicronBench 35%, 2,450 samples	2x