Daktech Gemini 67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDaktech Gemini 67  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110815
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 01:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$189
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 162
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 395
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2008) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 89 95 102 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 378
Write 156
Mixed 162
SusWrite 101
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 25.6
100% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 199
160% 230 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
34GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 83
Write 85.7
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 73.8
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA1339J.M8F Kingston 9965413-002.A00LF Kingston 9965413-002.A00LF CT51264BA1339J.M8F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.4% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 6% 16 39 12 60 27" 1280 720 GSM58C8 E2742
Typical Gemini 67 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Daktech Gemini 67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback