Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX517ZM
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 23:01
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
65% Good
Memory 58.1
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 187
60% 110 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 641
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 906
56% 906 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 65%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1C6C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3962
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 21
Parallax 17.9
12% 17.9 fps
MRender 18.4
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 15.3
14% 17.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA LEGEND 700 GOLD 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1226A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 236 77 240 242 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 1,390
Write 1,294
Mixed 176
SusWrite 204
169% 766 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 7.7
55% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 547
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 33.9
87% 200 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 271%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
623GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1583 1428 1617 1602 1598 1629 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,755
Write 1559
Mixed 1,412
SusWrite 1,576
355% 1,576 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 64.9
210% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 728
542% 719 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 264%
Great: 438%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD5S480016G-B 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 53.4
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 50.6
152% 53 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 130%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 32 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM Builds (Compare 1,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback