Aierben NA12

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemIntel NA12
MotherboardAierben NA12  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 11:18
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1280P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 188
2-Core 340
108% 203 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 911
92% 744 Pts
64-Core 1351
84% 1351 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 78.4
59% 75.9 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 69.4
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 672 621 400 403 405 404 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 698
Write 697
Mixed 648
SusWrite 484
142% 632 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 81.2
277% 98.8 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 762
579% 780 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 179%
Great: 300%
Amicro AM8180 NVME 4TB
950GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 72 33 38 42 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.1% Good
Read 447
Write 300
Mixed 366
SusWrite 82.9
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 32.2
113% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 87.2
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 125
98% 132 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-S16G-3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 38.5
114% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 28.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 60 28.9" 1280 720 PHL0000 PHILIPS FTV
Typical NA12 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Aierben NA12

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback