Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3405VC
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 22:23
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 39.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
67% 133 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 613
71% 550 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 3038) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4629
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.3% Average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 64.7
52% 60.4 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 57.3
Splatting 56.7
42% 49.9 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X108N 1TB
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51002C30 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,070
Write 1,059
Mixed 899
225% 1,009 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 23.8
111% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 554
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 438
319% 422 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 294%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 51 144 14" 1280 729 BOE0BC7
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VC Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback