Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime67.2 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 14:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 4700S 8-Core Desktop Kit
BL5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 51.4
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 202
62% 117 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 610
61% 496 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.5% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 118
Parallax 121
102% 122 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.1
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
466GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 267 289 303 189 72 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown U... 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
168% Outstanding
MC Read 53
MC Write 69.8
MC Mixed 82.4
195% 68.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 24.9
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 168%
This bench: 168%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 23.5" 1280 720 PHLC0D1 PHL 243V5
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback