Asrock X370M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X370M  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 16:31
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 296
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 891
85% 703 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.7% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 78.5
46% 58 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 43.4
44% 55.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,205
Write 1,043
Mixed 996
241% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 41.2
140% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 275
262% 433 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 216%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA331 1TB
324GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 125 122 127 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 116
Write 104
Mixed 59
SusWrite 125
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$54
503GB free
Firmware: NA00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 114 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 113
Write 112
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 114
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U32008G16A-DT41 AX4U32008G16A-BT41 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77% Very good
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 24.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 75 17" 1280 720 ACRAD46 AL1706
Typical X370M Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback