HP Laptop 17-cn0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 17-cn0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 883E
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 16:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Memory 14.5
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 66.2
22% 40.4 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 125
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
HP(103C 883E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.39% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2.1
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.39%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSELN128GA87MC0 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPE4BP00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 78 69 62 64 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 430
Write 84.2
Mixed 292
SusWrite 77.8
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 29.7
71% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 132
100% 137 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 1.8
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 678
6% 678 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 37 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUO9C92
Typical Laptop 17-cn0xxx Builds (Compare 1,144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 17-cn0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback