| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120810 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 05 '18 at 05:40 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.2%
Very good
|
74% 126 Pts
|
49% 367 Pts
|
23% 372 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.1%
Below average
|
32% 45.3 fps
|
32% 39.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
37.1%
Below average
|
35% 158 MB/s
|
63% 21.6 MB/s
|
16% 27.4 MB/s
|
|
|
55.2%
Above average
|
54% 74.5 MB/s
|
80% 0.85 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.6%
Poor
|
26% 9.23 GB/s
|
26% 9 GB/s
|
60% 66.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,676 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 191x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 178x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 167x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 235x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 109x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 106x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $525 |