Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 12:11
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 208
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 379
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 16.2
14% 17 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 15.7
13% 16 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 77 82 11 80 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 444
Write 399
Mixed 27
SusWrite 109
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 1.2
43% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 42
47% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
158GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 414 356 363 351 342 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,438
Write 1,462
Mixed 1,147
SusWrite 450
252% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 54.1
177% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 880
DQ Write 421
DQ Mixed 649
482% 650 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 169%
Great: 237%
HX512GSSDSATA3 512GB
474GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 380 392 405 412 411 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 464
Write 402
Mixed 328
SusWrite 394
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 25.7
109% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 42.5
87% 170 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 30.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 25.5
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 50 0.7" 1280 720 OEM3700 32W_LCD_TV
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback