Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory115.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 22:53
Run Duration406 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3970X-$1,900
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 1,101
98% 827 Pts
64-Core 5,542
343% 5,542 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,377
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 316
Parallax 214
97% 216 fps
MRender 290
Gravity 240
Splatting 202
195% 244 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 124%
Great: 179%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 4TB
907GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2178 394 424 772 537 473 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 2,636
Mixed 1,700
SusWrite 796
368% 1,623 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 82.1
271% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,277
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 1,096
822% 1,102 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 237%
Great: 403%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3698 3762 3766 3854 3894 3907 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
448% Outstanding
Read 1,984
Write 2,089
Mixed 2,230
SusWrite 3,813
574% 2,529 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 81.1
271% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,337
DQ Write 993
DQ Mixed 1,165
871% 1,165 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 448%
Great: 502%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
846GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 449 449 449 449 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 449
Mixed 410
SusWrite 449
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 54.9
180% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
685GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 363 363 363 363 363 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 224
Write 361
Mixed 239
SusWrite 355
67% 295 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 29.3
94% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 204
143% 178 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 354%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 182 179 179 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 188
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 179
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99%
Great: 112%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$120
4.5TB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 193 195 191 192 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 171
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 192
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
237% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 169 169 171 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 187
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 170
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
203% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 88 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 133
Write 114
Mixed 92
SusWrite 88.7
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
221% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$120
2TB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 154 156 153 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 154
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 155
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
250% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 122 124 119 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 131
Write 154
Mixed 109
SusWrite 120
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
377% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 94%
WD Elements 25A3 18TB
8TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 171 174 176 172 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 206
Mixed 162
SusWrite 174
252% 187 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 2.7
447% 6.97 MB/s
DQ Read 3.3
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 2.2
407% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 111%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
915GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 105 109 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42% Average
Read 81.7
Write 83.9
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 108
118% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTRG 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
171% Outstanding
MC Read 73.2
MC Write 53.2
MC Mixed 77.6
194% 68 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 40.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 171%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 31.5" 1920 1017 DELD139 DELL G3223D
Typical GA-TRX40 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 314%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $3,368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback