Alienware Aurora R15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware Aurora R15  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 049PDM
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 07:03
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$277
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 77.9
1-Core 211
2-Core 419
121% 236 Pts
4-Core 877
8-Core 1,626
150% 1,251 Pts
64-Core 2,962
183% 2,962 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 121%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
Dell(1028 513A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
198% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 398
Parallax 285
229% 321 fps
MRender 364
Gravity 242
Splatting 192
209% 266 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 198%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC SN810 WDC 1024GB
666GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61912523 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,224
Write 2,471
Mixed 2,094
576% 2,596 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 60.9
207% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,159
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 909
637% 822 MB/s
Poor: 166% Great: 544%
Nvme CT2000T50 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: P8CR002 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,370
Write 2,068
Mixed 1,662
452% 2,034 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 50.5
174% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1158
DQ Write 416
DQ Mixed 885
628% 820 MB/s
Poor: 228% Great: 647%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MTC4C10163S1UC48BA1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 61.7
MC Write 51.6
MC Mixed 51.8
157% 55 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 48.7
SC Mixed 26.1
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 85.9
46% 85.9 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 142%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 144 23.8" 1280 720 ONNABC2 100027813
Typical Aurora R15 Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 597%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $2,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback