Asrock H110M-HDS R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H110M-HDS R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160914
Uptime	44.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '23 at 18:04
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 139 56% 94.8 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 220 27% 205 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.9.2 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Lighting 25 Reflection 27.6 Parallax 35.7 20% 29.4 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 29.2 Splatting 25.1 22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 148 177 167 186 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.8% Average	Read 121 Write 88.4 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 164 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 21.8 54% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 101 105% 171 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 233GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 110 111 115 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 89.5 Write 98.2 Mixed 52.9 SusWrite 112 64% 88 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 1x8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 11.6 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 6.9 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	25"	1280 720	GSM588A M2550D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-HDS R3.0 Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS R3.0

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	47x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	32x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	16x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	15x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $54Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	8x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x8GBUnknownBench 48%, 3,623 samples	6x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16