Lenovo 82XN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82XN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 01:34
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 160
56% 100 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 436
47% 375 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Legend(17AA 3C39) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.45
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
4.39% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 11.6
4% 9.2 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.39%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002V3LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 311 305 281 286 266 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 498
Write 467
Mixed 436
SusWrite 317
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 21.3
88% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 380
278% 375 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 45 0 14" 1280 720 LEN9022
Typical 82XN Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82XN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback