Asus N56VB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N56VB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N56VB
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 15 '16 at 19:17
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 142
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 207
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1477) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 2.75
3% 4.04 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.65
4% 4.99 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 507
Write 361
Mixed 419
95% 429 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 4.04
56% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 30.1
77% 160 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 86%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
462GB free
Firmware: JF4OA200 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66% Good
Read 118
Write 112
Mixed 117
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.23
77% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS512MSK64W6H Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 16.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N56VB Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N56VB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback