Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 11:25
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 137
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 193
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 10.4
6% 9.13 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 6.9
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$54
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 347 345 359 361 363 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 258
Write 184
Mixed 150
SusWrite 351
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 21.9
79% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 39.3
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 49.6
44% 64.3 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 075D GR1600D364L11/2G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2701 27B1
Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback