Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '18 at 02:34
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 112
54% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 204
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 37.4
32% 35.8 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 35.7
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 72.5
Write 61.9
Mixed 65.5
50% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.22
4K Write 5.09
4K Mixed 2.74
617% 4.35 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Ccboot iSCSI 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 62.8
Mixed 63.6
50% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 4.68
4K Mixed 2.78
583% 3.99 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A75M-D3H Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback