Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu D3231-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu D3231-S1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3231-S1
Memory17.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 04:04
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 183
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 466
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.9% Good
Lighting 87
Reflection 87.6
Parallax 75.8
71% 83.5 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 78
Splatting 72.2
59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3E00100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 386 406 410 408 407 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 433
Mixed 417
SusWrite 383
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 32.5
141% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 121
145% 249 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 100%
Integral Portable SSD 3.0 120GB
15GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.5% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 40.4
Mixed 39
SusWrite 38.8
9% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 10.9
40% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 26.1
DQ Mixed 14.4
14% 22.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
463GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 129 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 136
Write 122
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 129
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 76%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT8GC64B8HB0NF-DI 1315 BLE4G3D1869DE1TX0. 1311 NT8GC64B8HB0NF-DI 20GB
1600, 1867, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 0P 5R 10G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 17% 118 218 60 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELA0DB DELL P2417H
Typical D3231-S1 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Fujitsu D3231-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $557
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback