Today's hottest deals

MSI B250M GAMING PRO (MS-7A65)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A65
MotherboardMSI B250M GAMING PRO (MS-7A65)  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 06:15
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$41
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 364
43% 331 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Lighting 73.3
Reflection 112
Parallax 69.7
60% 85.2 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 67.6
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 140 47 65 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 466
Write 295
Mixed 319
SusWrite 82.2
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 30.5
125% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 8.5
54% 128 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.5% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.4
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 9 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical B250M GAMING PRO (MS-7A65) Builds (Compare 1,745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B250M GAMING PRO (MS-7A65)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback